Orato.com’s Pickton trial correspondents
– two former sex workers – have posted their first stories
at http://www.orato.com/node/1537
and http://www.orato.com/node/1538.
Though the citizen journalism news site announced its plans to hire
the two women weeks ago, buzz has yet to die down. Editor-in-chief
Paul Sullivan posts regularly about the decision, lauding the women’s
first articles as testaments to the “real” Pickton trial
story about the “senseless loss of so many beautiful souls.”
Sullivan’s most recent post, filed Monday,
defends the decision for giving a “voice to the voiceless”
and advancing free speech while maintaining a degree of “accuracy
and clarity” through fact-checking processes with editors.
But not all journalism ethicists agree that hiring
former sex workers to speak for the murdered victims in the trial
demonstrates the legitimacy of citizen journalism as a news source.
Former journalism ethics professor and author
Nick Russell questions the move’s sincerity. Noting Sullivan’s
media relations background, Russell sees the move as a possible
publicity stunt. “[Sullivan] understands better than most
people the need to promote any medium, to build audience,”
he explains. “Sending former street workers to cover the trial
will certainly do that.”
Sullivan counters that Orato.com has been soliciting
stories from non-journalists for six months now. “That’s
our point: to get people who are involved in stories to tell their
story.” If there were a subway bombing, Orato.com would seek
a subway passenger.
Russell and Sullivan are both unwilling to call
the unaccredited correspondents to the Pickton trial “journalists,”
but Sullivan is confident that he is filling a need.
“You’ve got 300 people accredited
to this trial. There’s going to be a surfeit of coverage.
Every dimension of the trial is going to be covered. We have to
think about it in the context of that fact, that we’re a dimension
of coverage.”
Russell reminds that there are as many as 34 million
bloggers in the world now, most of them writing first-person accounts
of their own experiences. In an over-covered trial, Russell doubts
that one more news source, even written in first-person, will add
anything substantively different or useful.
“In terms of providing grist for the
mills of human knowledge, [orato.com’s correspondents] may
not add much,” he says. “Meanwhile, adding to the media
circus will just make it more difficult for the citizens to keep
an open mind on the Pickton trial, judging the defendant on the
evidence submitted to the jury.”